On July 26, 2006 MANUSHI SANGATHAN
in collaboration with NASVI organized the first all-India
Jansunvayi (Public Hearing) of street vendors at Kamani auditorium
in order to bring the issue of assaults on street traders
to the notice of high level policy makers in the country.
The frequency of these assaults has increased due to the nonimplementation
of a liberalized licensing regime for vendors as envisaged
by the National Policy for Street Vendors. A concrete plan
of Action was presented to a highpowered panel chaired by
the Union Minister for Urban Development, Jaipal Reddy. Other
members of the Sunvayi panel were Kumari Selja (Minister of
State, Poverty Alleviation), Ramesh Chauhan (Bisleri International),
Dilip Cherian (Business consultant and columnist), Renuka
Vishwanathan (Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development), Prof.
K.C. Sivaramakrishnan (Centre for Policy Research), Tavleen
Singh (writer and columnist), Rajeev Sethi (Chairman, Asian
Heritage Foundation), Syeda Hameed, (Member, Planning Commission),
Nitish Sengupta (Member of Parliament and former member of
the Planning Commission), Indira Jaisingh ( Senior Advocate,
Supreme Court) and Prithvi and Surekha Sharma (India Friends
Association),long time supporters of this cause from the US
also joined us on this occasion.
Street vendors representing 276 vendor unions from more than
60 cities and towns of India came to pressure national policy
makers to
|
|
Jaipal Reddy, Union Minister for
Urban Develpment performing Jhadu Pooja along with
other Jansunwayi panelists |
|
|
expedite the liberalization of the licensing regime for street
hawkers. The meeting began with Jaipal Reddy and other panelists
performing Jhadu Pooja ( ritual worship of the broom) as is the
standard practice in all our meetings. (For the meaning and details
of the ritual see issue Nos. 127 and 147 on our website) Jansunvayi
of vendors and the first time ever when such a cross section of
influential citizens and policy makers gathered together to pay
attention to this issue.
Shocking Revelations
The panel was particularly moved and shocked by the incidents of
selfimmolation by desperate vendors following eviction of hawker
markets in Patiala, Gwalior and Lucknow captured on film by Sunil
Umarao of MANUSHI. These short films are part of a larger portrayal
of the battles of street vendors in various cities of India to defend
their right to livelihood in the face of continuing assaults by
police and municipal agencies. (A detailed account of these suicides
are available in issue No. 153 of MANUSHI as well as on our website
www.manushi-india.org in the article titled, “Destroying Swadeshi
Retail Sector to Make Way for Videshi Retailers?”).
|
Street vending is an important source of self-employment
for the poor in India. Hawkers play a vital role in the distribution
of items of daily consumption at relatively low prices to
all classes of consumers at convenient locations, thus saving
urban citizens a great deal of time, energy and money for
procuring their daily requirements. These street retailers
therefore help the farm sector as well as the small-scale
industry by acting as channels of distribution of their goods
in every nook and corner of the country at minimal costs,
bringing vitality to the urban economy. As per conservative
estimates, the total all India turnover of business by street
vendors is at least Rs 86,000 crores.In Delhi alone, their
turnover is over 3000 crore.
Economic reforms have liberalized controls over a small section
of the corporate sector and consequently given an unprecedented
boost to economic growth in select areas. However, these reforms
have been confined to a tiny segment of the population of
the country and therefore the benefits of liberalization are
not reaching the vast majority of self-employed sections in
the informal sector who constitute more than 90 per cent of
the work force in India. The needless and harmful controls
imposed upon street vendors provide an example of how the
License Quota Raid Raj continues to exercise tyrannical control
over the livelihoods of the self-employed poor, despite the
rhetoric of liberalization. |
According to municipal laws it is illegal to vend without a license
issued at the sole discretion of the municipalities. Yet, the municipalities
in India have stopped issuing licenses to street vendors decades
ago, consequently trapping more than one crore vendors of India
in a web of illegality, thus making vendors and street hawkers easy
targets of extortion rackets.
The Extent of Problem
In Delhi for example, there are around three lakh vendors,
but licenses have only been issued to around 3000. In Mumbai,
after a High Court and Supreme Court order, licenses were
issued to about 15,000 out of 4 lakh vendors. In Patna only
2000 vendors out of 80,000 have received licenses after a
long struggle. In Ahmedabad, the Municipal Corporation issued
a circular in 1993 saying that henceforth no new licenses
would be issued and all old licenses were invalid. This illegal
status makes vendors vulnerable to bribes, beatings, arrests
and extortion by mafias. During the course of the Public Hearing,
MANUSHI gave the example of Anil Kumar and his brother who
sell channa paranthas at Rs. 5 per plate in a West Delhi colony.
( The picture above shows their vending cart.) They work at
least 16 to 17 hours a day, beginning food preparations as
early as 3.30 a.m. so that by 7 a.m. they are ready to
provide freshly cooked food to
cycle
|
|
As per conservative
estimates, the total all
India turnover of
business by street
vendors is at least Rs
86,000 crores. In Delhi
alone, their turnover is
over 3000 crore.
|
|
rickshaw pullers and other working poor who do not have cooking
facilities in the jhuggies and pavements they live on. On an average,
they work nearly 16 hours a day. Together the two brothers earn about
Rs. 6000 per month. Out of this small income, they are forced to pay
the following amounts as bribes every month:
Police : Rs. 1000;
MCD health Inspector : Rs. 400;
MCD general Inspector : Rs. 200;
An unnamed govt. official : Rs. 100;
MCD sweeper : Rs.60;
Total : Rs. 1760 per month.
This means nearly a third of their already low income is siphoned
off by governement employees, which prevents them from moving out
of the poverty trap.
MANUSHI’s audio visual presentation shed light on how in
Delhi alone the terror unleashed by the License Quota Raid Raj and
the regular farce of Clearance Operations targeted at vendors lead
to the loss of income of Rs 500 crores every year due to bribes,
confiscation of goods, long periods of forced idleness, and heavy
indebtedness. In Bombay, vendors pay close to 400 crores a year
by way of bribes to the municipal inspectors and police.
The street vendors urged the Union Minister for Urban Development
to ensure that government policies not be aimed at destroying the
Swadeshi Retail Sector to make way for FDI and corporate sector
investment in retail sector. They should instead let the Ambanis
and Walmarts compete with vendors rather than seek to destroy them
through state action. Delhi should lead the way and create a model
of a Caring People-Friendly World City in preparation for the Commonwealth
Games by creating model hawker markets all over the city.
Our Slogan, Our Motto
The following slogan encapsulates the spirit behind MANUSHI’s
approach to this issue:
Na chahiye chhoot subsidy,
Mangen samta ka vyavhar,
Na chahiye reham ki khhichdi,
Le ke rahenge bhay mukt, ghoos
mukt rozgar.
(We don’t want concessions or subsidies, All we want is
equal treatment, We don’t need crumbs of charity, We will
not rest till we have the right to bribe-free, terror-free livelihood.)
Major Landmarks in Battle
Because of the cruelty and tyranny unleashed on them by municipal
agencies and the police, street vendors of various cities have knocked
at the doors of the Supreme Court for a number of years. The Constitution
considers the Right to Livelihood as one of the fundamental rights
of every citizen. The following landmark Supreme Court judgements
have declared that street vending is a legitimate occupation and
therefore entitled to protection under the Constitution which considers
the Right to Livelihood as one of the fundamental rights of every
citizen:
• SEWA Vs Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. Supreme Court
Judgment, 1983.
• Bombay Hawkers Union Versus Bombay Municipal Corporation
Judgment of the Supreme Court (1985).
• Sodhan Singh & Others vs. NDMC 1987. Decided on August
30, 1989.
• Gainda Ram & Others vs. MCD & Others 1986 decided
by the Supreme Court on May 12, 1993 laying down guidelines for
vending licenses. Claims under this are still not settled.
In addition, polices have also been formulated for hawkers at
the highest levels:
1) Former Prime Minister Vajpayee’s New Policy for Delhi
Street Vendors, in August 2001, came in response to a sustained
campaign by MANUSHI.
2) National Policy for Street Vendors was adopted by the Central
Cabinet in January 2004 due to combined pressure of vendors’
organizations from all over India.
Yet despite this progress these policies have remained unimplemented
primarily due to the vested interests of those who benefit from
keeping them illegal. Nonetheless, solutions are within easy reach
if there is a strong political will to find and implement them.
|
Our Demands and Expectations
The organizers of Jansunvayi recommended the following Action Plan:
• Make it mandatory for state governments to liberalise
the licensing regime for hawkers and create adequate and well planned
hawker zones as an integral part of their City Development Plans
if they are to qualify for hefty grants for modernizing their cities
and towns under the Rs.50,000 crore Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal
Mission (JNNURM).
• Create a high powered and committed Task Force for the implementation
of the National Policy for Street Vendors.
• Select certain cities (such as Delhi, Ahmedabad, Patna and
Bangalore) to showcase concrete examples of how vendors can be integrated
into the city landscape in a dignified and aesthetic manner.
• Undertake a ward-by-ward, cluster-by-cluster, street-by-street,
and market-by-market photographic digitalized census of street vendors
and precise mapping of the areas where they are located. Special
attention should be paid to the weekly markets and haat bazaars
in different areas.
• Commission a group of senior architects and urban planners
to make ward-by-ward plans for carving out Hawker Zones and redesigning
pavements in such a way that vendors can be accommodated without
inconveniencing pedestrians or obstructing the flow of vehicular
traffic. The planning of hawker markets should respect the principle
of “natural markets”.
• Empower the Task Force to set up the Street Vendor Registration
and Grievance Redressal Committees in each municipal ward.
• Plan the Hawker Zones on the Sewa Nagar Model Vendor market
executed by MANUSHI in Delhi, which have resulted in significant
and noticeable reduction of congestion, ensured far greater cleanliness,
as well as brought an aesthetic touch to the entire area by providing
suitable infrastructure such as proper pavements, cleaning arrangements,
and open beautified public spaces. (For details see our website
www.manushi-india.org) |
When Ministers are Helpless
Responding to the evidence presented during the course of
the meeting, Mr. Reddy said “I have attended many public
hearings and meetings in my life. However, this is one public
hearing I will never forget. It has left a powerful, long-lasting
impact on me and I will make sure we do something to address
this problem.” He then went on to promise that his Ministry
would try to implement the Action Plan proposed by MANUSHI
for Delhi so that the Capital City could lead by example.
However, although vendors from Delhi were enthused, those
who had come from other states were rather disappointed when
he expressdd helplessness in enforcing the National Policy
for Street Vendors in various states because creating hawking
zones is a state subject. He said, the Central Government
cannot dictate this policy on state governments.
At this, there were loud protests from people from outside
Delhi who felt that a Union Minister should not disown responsibility
for enforcing national policies on state governments. Renuka
Viswanathan and Madhu Kishwar both
pointed out that if the |
|
A view of the Public Hearing at
Kamani auditorium |
|
implementation of the new policy for vendors were to be made a necessary
qualifying criteria for release of grants under Jawahar Lal Nehru
Urban Renewal Fund, state governments would have no choice but to
comply.
Promises by Panelists
All the members of the panel expressed strong support for the cause
of vendors. Rajeev Sethi commented that hawker markets have been
an integral part of our urban culture and have always created many
innovative ways for reaching out to customers. He proceeded to read
a poem written by famous Urdu shayar Nazir, a contemporary of Mirza
Ghalib, whose life and work is immortalized in Habib Tanvir’s
famous play Agra Bazar. Street vendors of those days would have
Nazir compose such popular shayari and songs to draw attention to
the goods they sold in the bazaar. Unfortunately, the new laws proposed
by municipal agencies make it illegal for vendors to attract attention
of customers by such means. Consequently the threat of routine beatings
and assaults have silenced the traditional songs of our vendors
and made their selling techniques less
aesthetic.
Syeda Hameed assured MANUSHI that she would take up this cause
within the Planning Commission. Prof. Sivaramakrishnan said that
as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee of the JNNURM, he
too would take up this cause with his colleagues.
However, Ela Bhatt, Founder President of SEWA, expressed deep pessimism,
saying that this was one issue on which even SEWA had failed to
make any progress despite decades of struggle and the aid of several
Supreme Court judgments and policy reform measures in favour of
vendors that were initially announced with much fanfare.
Indira Jaisingh promised that she would continue lending support
to this movement by fighting such cases through the Courts. She
shared anger and disillusionment with the fact that no progress
had been made on the issue despite long drawn battles spread over
nearly three decades, but said: “ I have no doubt that this
Jansunvai will go a long way in influencing government policy and
help hawkers claim their rights.”
Although Ramesh Chauhan refrained from making any public statements,
he assured MANUSHI of his desire to see the rich and poor join together
to make the agenda of economic reforms reach all sections of society.
Tavleen Singh, a long time supporter of MANUSHI on this and many
other related issues reiterated her commitment to securing economic
freedom for the poor.
Nitish Sengupta sent a note the next day saying: “I went
to the function as an observer with some theoretical interest in
the subject. I came back as a convert to the cause that you so effectively
focused through this programme. I only wish I had attended such
a programme when I was Member Secretary, Planning Commission or
a Member of Lok Sabha. But never mind, please treat me as one of
your associates in this programme and count upon whatever support
I am capable of providing you.”
Responding to the assurances given by Kumari Selja Minister of
State for Poverty Alleviation , Arbind Singh of NASVI suggested
that the minister call meetings of municipal agencies in various
cities to generate interest and put pressure on bureaucrats and
local politicians to take this task seriously. He stressed that
such meetings are very useful in influencing state policies and
creating allies within the administration.
The Mayor of Delhi, Mr. Farhad Suri, could not attend the Public
Hearing due to an emergency that prevented him from reaching the
meeting, but he called the next day not only to express his regrets
but also to assure MANUSHIof his desire to develop a Sewa Nagar
type model market for hawkers in some of the areas of his Old Delhi
constituency.
|
A vendor giving his testimony at
the Public Hearing |
|
Messages of Support
We received the following message of support from Rajdeep
Sardesai and Sagarika Ghose of CNN/ IBN, whose consistent
effort has been an invaluable asset to the cause since MANUSHI
began this work: “This is to convey our deepest support
and heartfelt appreciation for the campaign to get the government
to hear the voices of street vendors. Street vendors are a
crucial part of our daily lives, they are highly important
economic beings and we feel an essential part of the Indian
city. The plight of the street vendors in many ways illustrates
how the economic reforms process still remains elitist and
focused on the created to make urban life the best possible
one for all inhabitants, rich and poor. A flyover that provides
speedy access for a Pajero but makes life difficult for the
rera patri or the vendor must be re-examined and rethought.
Lets reclaim our cities from the western imagination and provide
all possible help to those who are the lifeblood of our urban
centres. So all our support to this crucial and excellent
campaign, a true forward movement in the ‘independence’
of India.”
|
|
Finally, UPA Chairperson and Congress President, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi
sent the following message of solidarity: “MANUSHI has been
working of the Loksunvayi being organized by MANUSHI in July 2006.”
Even though we hope that such expressions of support will translate
into concrete action for reforming the existing system, we know
from past experience that it will require a lot of patient effort,
battling and lobbying before the government agencies yield ground.
|
The full text of MANUSHI’s presentation on
the plight of street vendors is available on our website www.manushi-india.org.
Small films, which were part of the presentation, will be put up on
our website shortly. |
|
|
|
|
|
Designed
by: Madhu Purnima Kishwar and Maintained by: Ravinder
Khurana.com
Copyright © 2006, Manushi Trust, All Rights Reserved. |
|
|